British Airways data breach bigger than originally thought

Back in September, British Airways announced that they had experienced a data breach. After a lengthy investigation carried out by third-party cybersecurity threat responders and the National Crime Agency, it was determined that the breach is far larger than originally thought. In an updated statement on their website, British Airways had this to say:

The investigation has shown the hackers may have stolen additional personal data and we are notifying the holders of 77,000 payment cards, not previously notified, that the name, billing address, email address, card payment information, including card number, expiry date and CVV have potentially been compromised, and a further 108,000 without CVV. The potentially impacted customers were those only making reward bookings between April 21 and July 28, 2018, and who used a payment card.

The company insists that there are no instances of known fraud that can be attributed to the data breach. It should be noted that this does not mean fraud hasn’t happened, it just means it has yet to be recognized and reported via official channels. British Airways has also stated that they are meticulously notifying all potential victims in their customer base and instructing them to stay in contact with their bank or credit card provider to stay informed. In a rather generous act, the company has also promised reimbursement to any customer negatively impacted by the breach.

As important as it is to understand the impact of the British Airways data breach, it is also imperative to understand what and/or who caused the breach in the first place. In an interview with Kaspersky Lab’s Threatpost, Yonathan Klijnsma, a threat researcher with RiskIQ, attributed it to the infamous Magecart cybergang:

Magecart since 2017 has been running a campaign very similar to what happened to British Airways... They’ve been setting up infrastructure to mimic victims or they would simply mimic ad or analytics providers to blend in. The British Airways attack was just an extension of that attack in our eyes.

While this does sound like Magecart’s modus operandi, it is also important to note that Klijnsma only had “medium-high confidence” of their involvement. All leads should be pursued until we can absolutely be certain that the notorious Magecart is the culprit (which is without a doubt a major possibility). In the meantime, all customers affected by the British Airways data breach should be aware of their finances even more so than usual and take advantage of the services that British Airways is providing to rectify the situation.

Featured image: Flickr / Bill Wilt

Derek Kortepeter

Derek Kortepeter is a graduate of UCLA and tech journalist that is committed to creating an informed society with regards to Information Security. Kortepeter specializes in areas such as penetration testing, cryptography, cyber warfare, and governmental InfoSec policy.

Share
Published by
Derek Kortepeter

Recent Posts

Making retail mobile e-commerce apps more secure

Many e-commerce mobile apps are insecure, opening the businesses that use them to severe risks.…

17 hours ago

With eyes on the ‘Zoom boom,’ Microsoft launches Teams apps for meetings

Microsoft continues to leverage its hot Microsoft Teams. With an eye on the popularity of…

20 hours ago

Exchange 2019 and 2013: Is coexistence possible? Yes, here’s how

Exchange 2019 and 2013 coexistence can be achieved, but the road is winding and filled…

23 hours ago

Finding API code vulnerabilities before they reach production

A powerful add-on for GitHub’s code-scanning feature lets you get your API code analyzed for…

2 days ago

Pray.com app exposes millions of users in massive data leak

Pray.com is one of the most popular faith-based apps, so a data leak is a…

2 days ago

Merging and sorting files in Linux: Easier than you think

Here’s a walkthrough to guide you through the simple yet efficient process of merging and…

2 days ago